4.7 Article

E-cadherin breast tumor expression, risk factors and survival: Pooled analysis of 5,933 cases from 12 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23733-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHMRC
  2. National Breast Cancer Foundation
  3. Cancer Australia
  4. National Institute of Health (USA)
  5. Breast Cancer Now
  6. Institute of Cancer Research
  7. NHS
  8. Cancer Research UK [C1287/A16563, C1287/A10118, C1275/A11699, C1275/C22524, C1275/A19187, C1275/A15956]
  9. European Union's Horizon Research and Innovation Programme [634935, 633784]
  10. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [223175, HEALTH-F2-2009-223175]
  11. Dutch Cancer Society [NKI 2007-3839, 2009 4363, RUL 1997-1505, DDHK 2004-3124, DDHK 2009-4318]
  12. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  13. Red Tematica de Investigation Cooperativa en Cancer
  14. Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer
  15. Fondo de Investigation Sanitario [PI11/00923, PI12/00070]
  16. Baden Wurttemberg Ministry of Science, Research and Arts
  17. German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe)
  18. Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Fund
  19. Academy of Finland [266528]
  20. Finnish Cancer Society
  21. Nordic Cancer Union
  22. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  23. special Government Funding (EVO) of Kuopio University Hospital grants
  24. Cancer Fund of North Savo
  25. Finnish Cancer Organizations
  26. University of Eastern Finland
  27. Queensland Cancer Fund
  28. Cancer Council of New South Wales
  29. Cancer Council of Victoria
  30. Cancer Council of Tasmania
  31. Cancer Council of South Australia
  32. Cancer Foundation of Western Australia
  33. United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command [DAMD17-01-1-0729]
  34. Cancer Council Victoria
  35. Cancer Council New South Wales
  36. Cancer Council South Australia
  37. Cancer Council Tasmania
  38. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [400413, 400281, 199600]
  39. NIH [CA192393, CA116167, CA176785]
  40. NIH Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer [CA116201]
  41. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  42. CTSA Grant Program from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the NIH [UL1 TR000135, KL2TR000136-09]
  43. Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure [BBMRI-NL CP16]
  44. Intramural Research Funds of the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, USA
  45. Breast Cancer Campaign [2010PR62, 2013PR044]
  46. Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), London

向作者/读者索取更多资源

E-cadherin (CDH1) is a putative tumor suppressor gene implicated in breast carcinogenesis. Yet, whether risk factors or survival differ by E-cadherin tumor expression is unclear. We evaluated E-cadherin tumor immunohistochemistry expression using tissue microarrays of 5,933 female invasive breast cancers from 12 studies from the Breast Cancer Consortium. H-scores were calculated and case-case odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression. Survival analyses were performed using Cox regression models. All analyses were stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status and histologic subtype. E-cadherin low cases (N = 1191, 20%) were more frequently of lobular histology, low grade, > 2 cm, and HER2-negative. Loss of E-cadherin expression (score < 100) was associated with menopausal hormone use among ER-positive tumors (ever compared to never users, OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.97-1.59), which was stronger when we evaluated complete loss of E-cadherin (i.e. H-score = 0), OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.06-2.33. Breast cancer specific mortality was unrelated to E-cadherin expression in multivariable models. E-cadherin low expression is associated with lobular histology, tumor characteristics and menopausal hormone use, with no evidence of an association with breast cancer specific survival. These data support loss of E-cadherin expression as an important marker of tumor subtypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据