4.7 Article

Plasma and urinary metabolomic profiles of Down syndrome correlate with alteration of mitochondrial metabolism

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20834-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondazione Umano Progresso
  2. Radius S.r.l. - Technology for life
  3. Illumia S.p.A. (Bologna, Italy)
  4. H project PROPAG-AGEING [634821]
  5. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze
  6. H project PhenoMeNal [654241]
  7. Illumia S.p.A., Bologna, Italy
  8. community of Dozza, Bologna, Italy
  9. community of Dozza, Bologna, Italy Comitato Arzdore di Dozza
  10. community of Dozza, Bologna, Italy Parrocchia di Dozza
  11. community of Dozza, Bologna, Italy Pro-Loco di Dozza
  12. Costa family

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Down syndrome (DS) is caused by the presence of a supernumerary copy of the human chromosome 21 (Hsa21) and is the most frequent genetic cause of intellectual disability (ID). Key traits of DS are the distinctive facies and cognitive impairment. We conducted for the first time an analysis of the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)-detectable part of the metabolome in plasma and urine samples, studying 67 subjects with DS and 29 normal subjects as controls selected among DS siblings. Multivariate analysis of the NMR metabolomic profiles showed a clear discrimination (up to of 80% accuracy) between the DS and the control groups. The univariate analysis of plasma and urine revealed a significant alteration for some interesting metabolites. Remarkably, most of the altered concentrations were consistent with the 3: 2 gene dosage model, suggesting effects caused by the presence of three copies of Hsa21 rather than two: DS/normal ratio in plasma was 1.23 (pyruvate), 1.47 (succinate), 1.39 (fumarate), 1.33 (lactate), 1.4 (formate). Several significantly altered metabolites are produced at the beginning or during the Krebs cycle. Accounting for sex, age and fasting state did not significantly affect the main result of both multivariate and univariate analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据