4.5 Review

Progressive resistance training increases strength after stroke but this may not carry over to activity: a systematic review

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 84-90

出版社

AUSTRALIAN PHYSIOTHERAPY ASSOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.02.012

关键词

Stroke; Strength; Progressive resistance training; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Question: Does progressive resistance training improve strength and activity after stroke? Does any increase in strength carry over to activity? Design: Systematic review of randomised trials with metaanalysis. Participants: Adults who have had a stroke. Intervention: Progressive resistance training compared with no intervention or placebo. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was change in strength. This measurement had to be of maximum voluntary force production and performed in muscles congruent with the muscles trained in the intervention. The secondary outcome was change in activity. This measurement had to be a direct measure of performance that produced continuous or ordinal data, or with scales that produced ordinal data. Results: Eleven studies involving 370 participants were included in this systematic review. The overall effect of progressive resistance training on strength was examined by pooling change scores from six studies with a mean PEDro score of 5.8, representing medium quality. The effect size of progressive resistance training on strength was 0.98 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.29, I-2 = 0%). The overall effect of progressive resistance training on activity was examined by pooling change scores from the same six studies. The effect size of progressive resistance training on activity was 0.42 (95% CI -0.08 to 0.91, I2 = 54%). Conclusion: After stroke, progressive resistance training has a large effect on strength compared with no intervention or placebo. There is uncertainty about whether these large increases in strength carry over to improvements in activity. (C) 2018 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据