4.7 Review

Incidence of nausea and vomiting after intragastric balloon placement in bariatric patients - A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 22-29

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.038

关键词

Morbid obesity; Intragastric balloon; Intragastric balloons; Gastric balloon; Endoscopic bariatric therapy; Nausea; Vomiting; Dyspepsia; Abdominal pain; Adverse events

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to examine the rates of nausea and vomiting along with other common side effects reported from different subtypes of intragastric balloons (IGBs) placed in obese adults. Methods: The online databases of Pubmed, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science were searched to include studies conducted from 09/31/2012 to 09/31/2017 in English using keywords to identify articles relevant to this study. Two independent reviewers performed a full text review to ensure quality of studies and report rates of primary end point of interest: nausea and vomiting post IGB placement. Results: Ten studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The treatment group's sample size comprised of 688 patients and adverse events' sample size comprised of 938 patients. We evaluated rates of nausea and vomiting of four subtypes of IGB systems: Elipse, Obalon, ORBERA, and ReShape and calculated meta-analytic rates based on adverse events' sample size. Total 564 patients reported experiencing nausea which provided a meta-analytic rate of 63.33% (95% CI 61.49%-65.16%), and 507 patients reported experiencing vomiting which resulted in a meta-analytic rate of 55.29% (95% CI 53.59%-56.99%). The ORBERA balloon system had the highest rates of nausea and vomiting compared to other balloon systems. Conclusions: Based on the findings from previous studies scrutinizing side effects of different types of IGB offered on the market, it has been concluded that nausea and vomiting are very common side effects post gastric balloon placement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据