4.6 Article

Construction of solid-liquid interfacial Fenton-like reaction under visible light irradiation over etched CoxFeyO4-BiOBr photocatalysts

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 551-561

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cy01915g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21777063, 21407065]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province for Youths [BK20140533]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015T80514]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we constructed an in situ Fenton-like photocatalytic system driven by visible-light irradiation. First, BiOBr, a benign in situ H2O2 producer, was prepared via a simple hydrothermal method. Then, the accelerant (CoFe2O4 nanoparticles as the precursor) for H2O2 decomposition was loaded onto the surface of the BiOBr photocatalyst to build a well-contacted interface for reactive sites. CoxFeyO4 nanoparticles etched to different extents were obtained by adjusting the solution pH (pH = 1, 3 and 7) during the composite preparation process. A group of green and efficient CoxFeyO4-BiOBr photocatalysts (abbreviated as CFB) (pH = 1, 3 and 7) were successfully synthesized. The optimal CFB material used for BPA photodegradation was 0.5% CFB (pH = 3). The reaction rate constant of 0.5% CFB (pH = 3) was 3.4 times higher than BiOBr (pH = 3). H2O2 detection, ESR and radical trapping experiments demonstrated that much of the H2O2 produced by BiOBr (pH = 3) was successfully decomposed to O-center dot(2)- and (OH)-O-center dot, which played important roles with h(+) in the BPA photodegradation process, thereby a possible photocatalytic mechanism was proposed. Cycling experiments indicated the good stability of 0.5% CFB (pH = 3). This work may offer a green and efficient method for in situ H2O2 generation and decomposition, thus, the secondary pollution and harsh conditions of the conventional Fenton reaction can be tactfully avoided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据