4.8 Article

Enhanced Catalytic Performance for Propene Epoxidation with H-2 and O-2 over Bimetallic Au-Ag/Uncalcined Titanium Silicate-1 Catalysts

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 7799-7808

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b01324

关键词

propene epoxidation; Au-Ag bimetallic catalysts; TS-1-B; DFT; synergy

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21606254]
  2. Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province [2017GSF17126]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2016BB16]
  4. Independent Innovation Foundation of Qingdao [17-1-1-18-jch]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [18CX02014A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gradually emerging environmental concerns have triggered the development of highly efficient catalysts for propene epoxidation with H-2 and O-2. Unfortunately, intensifying the activity and stability is still a challenging task. Herein, Au-Ag bimetallic catalysts were deposited on titanium silicate-1 with blocked pores (TS-1-B). Via density functional theory calculations together with multiple types of characterization (e.g., high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy, ultraviolet-visible, and X-ray photoelectron spectrometry), we found that the synergy between Au and Ag significantly improved the catalytic performance via not only the decrease in the Au nanoparticle size but also the enhanced oxygen adsorption and electron transfer ability from Au to O-2. Furthermore, a volcano-shaped relationship between the Au/Ag ratio and catalytic performance was also established, and the Au-10-Ag-1/TS-1-B catalyst showed an excellent stable PO formation rate (174-233 g(PO) h(-1) g(Au)(-1)) and a H-2 efficiency of 44%, higher than those of the reported stable catalysts. The insights and methodology reported here may pave the way for maximizing Au utilization efficiency and unraveling the intrinsic structure-performance relationship of bimetallic catalysts for propene epoxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据