4.5 Article

Risk factors for esophageal fistula in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma receiving chemoradiotherapy

期刊

ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 2311-2317

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S161803

关键词

esophageal fistula; esophageal carcinoma; chemoradiotherapy; side effect; risk factors

资金

  1. Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation [ZR2016HM17, ZR2016HB39]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This study aimed to investigate risk factors for esophageal fistula in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma receiving chemoradiotherapy. Subjects and methods: The study prospectively enrolled 212 esophageal carcinoma patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy and evaluated 16 clinical parameters. The best cut-off values were determined by receiver operating characteristics curves. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by the Cox proportional hazards model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the cumulative probability. Results: In total, 22 patients (10.38%) developed esophageal fistula, of whom 9 experienced fistula during treatment and the other 13 patients developed fistula after chemoradiotherapy. The median time until occurrence was 5.75 months (range 0.6-8 months). In univariate analysis, the evaluated significant factors were Kamofsky performance status, smoking status, esophageal stenosis, T stage, fraction dose, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). In addition, esophageal stenosis (HR=4.089, 95% CI 1.451-11.527, p=0.008), T stage (HR=2.663, 95% CI 1.019-6.960, p=0.046), and CEA (HR=0.309, 95% CI 0.124-0.768, p=0.011) were revealed as risk parameters in further multivariate analysis. Conclusion: This is the first prospective study to evaluate factors associated with fistula formation in patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving chemoradiotherapy. More attention should be given to patients with esophageal stenosis, stage T4 disease, and high levels of CEA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据