Research on Piroplasmorida and other tick-borne agents: Are we going the right way?

The use of molecular diagnostic techniques in the study of ticks and tick-borne agents has increased dramatically in the last few decades, and while conferring the advantages of rapidity, sensitivity and accuracy, they can also be misused by the research community, who have shown an increasing overreliance on the data they produce, often completely abandoning more traditional approaches such as microscopy and serology. In this short review examples are provided of 'findings' that are apparently at odds with well-established eco-epidemiological knowledge, ranging from descriptions of new species of pathogens to their detection in new hosts and ticks, often immediately incriminated as new reservoir hosts and vector ticks, respectively. Most examples have been taken from the Piroplasmorida or piroplasm species as they are often called. Researchers are urged to utilize molecular methods with as much awareness as possible of the system or systems they are investigating, and journal editors and their teams of reviewers should be encouraged to adopt a more critical approach to papers that contain data based solely on molecular methods without due regard to the underlying biology. Explanations for such findings should be offered and discussed.