4.6 Article

Holistic Atlases of Functional Networks and Interactions Reveal Reciprocal Organizational Architecture of Cortical Function

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 62, 期 4, 页码 1120-1131

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2369495

关键词

Brain networks; cortical architecture; fMRI; interaction

资金

  1. NSF CAREER Award [IIS-1149260]
  2. NIH [R01 DA-033393, R01 AG-042599]
  3. NSF [CBET-1302089]
  4. NSFC [61273362, 61333017]
  5. China Government Scholarship
  6. Doctorate Foundation of NWPU
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  8. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1439051] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  10. Directorate For Engineering [1263524] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  12. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1149260] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For decades, it has been largely unknown to what extent multiple functional networks spatially overlap/interact with each other and jointly realize the total cortical function. Here, by developing novel sparse representation of whole-brain fMRI signals and by using the recently publicly released large-scale Human Connectome Project high-quality fMRI data, we show that a number of reproducible and robust functional networks, including both task-evoked and resting state networks, are simultaneously distributed in distant neuroanatomic areas and substantially spatially overlapping with each other, thus forming an initial collection of holistic atlases of functional networks and interactions (HAFNIs). More interestingly, the HAFNIs revealed two distinct patterns of highly overlapped regions and highly specialized regions and exhibited that these two patterns of areas are reciprocally localized, revealing a novel organizational principle of cortical function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据