4.7 Article

A Small-Gain Approach to Robust Event-Triggered Control of Nonlinear Systems

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
卷 60, 期 8, 页码 2072-2085

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2015.2396645

关键词

Cyclic-small-gain theorem; event-triggered control; input-to-state stability (ISS); nonlinear systems; robust control

资金

  1. NSF [DMS-0906659, ECCS-1230040]
  2. NSFC [61374042]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China [N130108001, N140805001]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Decision of Complex Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a new approach to event-triggered control for nonlinear uncertain systems by using the notion of input-to-state stability (ISS) and the nonlinear small-gain theorem. The contribution of this paper is threefold. First, it is proved that infinitely fast sampling can be avoided if the system is input-to-state stabilizable with the sampling error as the external input and the corresponding ISS gain is locally Lipschitz. No assumption on the existence of known ISS-Lyapunov functions is made in the discussions. Moreover, the forward completeness problem with event-triggered control is studied systematically by using ISS small-gain arguments. Second, the proposed approach gives rise to a new self-triggered sampling strategy for a class of nonlinear systems subject to external disturbances. If an upper bound of the external disturbance is known, then the closed-loop system can be designed to be robust to the external disturbance, and moreover, the system state globally asymptotically converges to the origin if the external disturbance decays to zero. Third, a new design method is developed for event-triggered control of nonlinear uncertain systems in the strict-feedback form. It is particularly shown that the ISS gain with the sampling error as the input can be designed to satisfy the proposed condition for event-triggered control and self-triggered control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据