4.1 Article

Serum Endocan Levels are Associated With Paraoxonase 1 Concentration in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

期刊

THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 325-331

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.12654

关键词

Atherosclerosis; Endocan; Hemodialysis; Paraoxonase; PON1; PON3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endocan is a soluble proteoglycan released by the vascular endothelium. The increase of its serum levels is associated with inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We studied the association of serum endocan with the lipid profile of 105 CKD patients with dyslipidemia, divided in two groups, non-dialyzed (CKD, N = 57) and hemodialysis (HD, N = 48) in comparison with 30 normal controls (NC). We also analyzed endocan in relation with the concentration of two serum HDL-linked members of the paraoxonase (PON) family, PON1 and PON3, which have been previously found to have antiatherogenic properties. The results showed that endocan levels were significantly higher in HD patients than in CKD patients (P < 0.001) and NC (P < 0.001). PON1 was significantly decreased only in HD patients compared to NC (P < 0.001), whereas PON3 was significantly increased in both patient groups (P < 0.001). Endocan levels were significantly and positively correlated with total cholesterol and LDL-C in CKD and additionally were negatively correlated with HDL-C in HD group. PON1 levels were significantly correlated with endocan in both groups, while no correlation was observed for PON3 in either group. Multiple regression analysis between endocan and the above lipid parameters in the total of patients revealed that endocan was independently associated only with PON1 (beta = -0.513, P = 0.002). It is concluded that the increase of serum endocan levels in patients with CKD may be associated with the decrease of PON1 concentration, irrespective of lipid alterations produced by atherosclerosis development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据