4.7 Article

Optimization of classification and regression analysis of four monoclonal antibodies from Raman spectra using collaborative machine learning approach

期刊

TALANTA
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 260-265

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.02.109

关键词

Machine learning; Chemometrics; Raman spectroscopy; Monoclonal antibody; Classification analysis; Regression analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) constitutes one of the most important strategies to treat patient suffering from cancers such as hematological malignancies and solid tumors. These antibodies are prescribed b; the physician and prepared by hospital pharmacists. An analytical control enables the quality of the preparation to be ensured. The aim of this study was to explore the development of a rapid analytical method for quality control. The method used four mAbs (Infliximab, Bevacizumab, Rituximab and Ramucirumab) at various con centrations and was based on recording Raman data and coupling them to a traditional chemometric and ma chine learning approach for data analysis. Compared to conventional linear approach, prediction errors an reduced with a data-driven approach using statistical machine learning methods. In the latter, preprocessing am predictive models are jointly optimized. An additional original aspect of the work involved on submitting th. problem to a collaborative data challenge platform called Rapid Analytics and Model Prototyping (RAMP). Thi allowed using solutions from about 300 data scientists in collaborative work. Using machine learning, the prediction of the four mAbs samples was considerably improved. The best predictive model showed a combines error of 2.4% versus 14.6% using linear approach. The concentration and classification errors were 5.8% an( 0.7%, only three spectra were misclassified over the 429 spectra of the test set. This large improvement obtainer with machine learning techniques was uniform for all molecules but maximal for Bevacizumab with an 88.34 reduction on combined errors (2.1% versus 17.9%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据