期刊
SYNTHESE
卷 197, 期 1, 页码 233-247出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-018-1778-8
关键词
Mathematical practice; Gaps in proofs; Peer review in mathematics; The nature of proofs
Mathematicians often intentionally leave gaps in their proofs. Based on interviews with mathematicians about their refereeing practices, this paper examines the character of intentional gaps in published proofs. We observe that mathematicians' refereeing practices limit the number of certain intentional gaps in published proofs. The results provide some new perspectives on the traditional philosophical questions of the nature of proof and of what grounds mathematical knowledge.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据