4.0 Article

Activity-dependent plasticity of presynaptic GABAB receptors at parallel fiber synapses

期刊

SYNAPSE
卷 72, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/syn.22027

关键词

cerebellum; GABAB; parallel fiber; plasticity; presynaptic; stellate; synapse

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 NS092809]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parallel fiber synapses in the cerebellum express a wide range of presynaptic receptors. However, presynaptic receptor expression at individual parallel fiber synapses is quite heterogeneous, suggesting physiological mechanisms regulate presynaptic receptor expression. We investigated changes in presynaptic GABA(B) receptors at parallel fiber-stellate cell synapses in acute cerebellar slices from juvenile mice. GABA(B) receptor-mediated inhibition of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) is remarkably diverse at these synapses, with transmitter release at some synapses inhibited by >50% and little or no inhibition at others. GABA(B) receptor-mediated inhibition was significantly reduced following 4 Hz parallel fiber stimulation but not after stimulation at other frequencies. The reduction in GABA(B) receptor-mediated inhibition was replicated by bath application of forskolin and blocked by application of a PKA inhibitor, suggesting activation of adenylyl cyclase and PKA are required. Immunolabeling for an extracellular domain of the GABA(B2) subunit revealed reduced surface expression in the molecular layer after exposure to forskolin. GABA(B) receptor-mediated inhibition of action potential evoked calcium transients in parallel fiber varicosities was also reduced following bath application of forskolin, confirming presynaptic receptors are responsible for the reduced EPSC inhibition. These data demonstrate that presynaptic GABA(B) receptor expression can be a plastic property of synapses, which may compliment other forms of synaptic plasticity. This opens the door to novel forms of receptor plasticity previously confined primarily to postsynaptic receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据