4.3 Article

Cognitive appraisals and emotional status following a spinal cord injury in post-acute rehabilitation

期刊

SPINAL CORD
卷 56, 期 12, 页码 1151-1157

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41393-018-0151-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study design Retrospective, cross-sectional study. Objectives To investigate the factor structure of the ADAPSS-short form (ADAPSS-SF) in an acutely injured SCI population and to assess the relationship between cognitive appraisals made in the initial phase of rehabilitation and the experience of anxiety and depression. Setting National Spinal Injuries Centre, UK. Method Participants were acutely injured patients admitted to the NSIC over 35 months. Cognitive appraisals were measured using the ADAPSS-SF; psychological distress was measured using the HADS. Individual profiles, including demographics and injury characteristics, were collected. Results Principle Component Analysis with oblique rotation demonstrated a coherent two-factor structure of the ADAPSSSF: resilience and loss. Correlational analysis found that individuals who negatively appraised their injury were more likely to report lower mood. Findings identified four vulnerable subgroups that were more likely to negatively appraise their injury: females, individuals older at the time of SCI, individuals with AIS-A injuries and individuals whose SCI was acquired through assault. Hierarchical regression analysis reported that resilience and loss factors were significant predictors of depression. Gender, resilience and loss factors were significant predictors of anxiety. Cognitive appraisals accounted for more variance in mood above biological markers. Conclusions Findings support a two-factor structure and validity of ADAPSS-SF in acute SCI rehabilitation. The study provides support for the role of cognitive appraisals in psychological adjustment in the early phases of rehabilitation, above injury characteristics. Findings highlighted the vulnerable subgroups that are more likely to initially endorse negative appraisals, which may influence clinical practice and provides an avenue for further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据