4.6 Article

Water security evaluation based on the TODIM method with probabilistic linguistic term sets

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 23, 期 15, 页码 6215-6230

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-018-3276-9

关键词

Probabilistic linguistic term set; The TODIM method; Water security; Comprehensive evaluation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571123, 71771155, 71501135, 71771156]
  2. Young scholars high level academic team construction project at Sichuan University [skgt201501]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for Excellent Young Scholars at SCU [2016SCU04A23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, water security is becoming increasingly prominent and the water security problem becomes a primary bottleneck restricting China's future sustainable development. Water security in China is thus worth conducting an in-depth study. This paper aims to explore an effective water security evaluation method. Based on the proposed definition of water security, an evaluation index system of water security is first built from the perspective of pressure-state-response conceptual model. Considering the indicators' uncertainty and the decision makers' (DMs') limited knowledge, the DMs usually use linguistic terms to express their judgements. As a new type of linguistic variable, probabilistic linguistic term set (PLTS) not only allows the DMs to express their judgements with multiple linguistic terms but also can reflect the DMs' different preference degrees over these possible linguistic terms. For the water security issue under probabilistic linguistic environment, a programming model is developed to derive the attribute weights. Then, the TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese for interactive multi-criteria decision making) method, which considers the psychological factors of the DMs, is used to evaluate water security based on the PLTS. Furthermore, a case study is conducted and some discussions and comparative analysis are carried out according to the case results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据