4.8 Article

Silver-Assisted Synthesis of Gold Nanorods: the Relation between Silver Additive and Iodide Impurities

期刊

SMALL
卷 14, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201703879

关键词

CTAB; gold nanorods; iodide and silver relation; plasmons; seed-mediated growth

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CTQ2014-59808R, CTQ2017-88648R, RYC2016-20331, RYC2015-19107]
  2. European Research Council [FP72014-623527, ERC-2012-StG 306686]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya [2014-SGR-480]
  4. Bavarian elite promotion act (BayEFG)
  5. Elite Network Bavaria within the framework of the Elite Study Program Macromolecular Science
  6. European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skodowska-Curie Grant [712.949]
  7. Agencia para la Competitividad de la Empresa de la Generalitat de Cataluna

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seed-mediated methods employing cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as a surfactant, and silver salts as additives, are the most common synthetic strategies for high-yield productions of quality Au nanorods. However, the mechanism of these reactions is not yet fully understood and, importantly, significant lab-to-lab reproducibility issues still affect these protocols. In this study, the direct correlation between the hidden content of iodide impurities in CTAB reagents, which can drastically differ from different suppliers or batches, and the optimal concentration of silver required to maximize the nanorods yield is demonstrated. As a result, high-quality nanorods are obtained at different iodide contents. These results are interpreted based on the different concentrations of CTAB and cetyltrimethylammonium iodide (CTAI) complexes with Ag+ and Au+ metal ions in the growth solution, and their different binding affinity and reduction potential on distinct crystallographic planes. Notably, the exhaustive conversion of CTAI-Au+ to CTAI-Ag+ appears to be the key condition for maximizing the nanorod yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据