4.1 Article

Relationship between sleep-disordered breathing and sleeping position at the 37th week of pregnancy: an observational cross-sectional study

期刊

SLEEP AND BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 441-447

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s41105-018-0174-6

关键词

Pregnancy; Sleep-disordered breathing; Obstetric complications; Sleep Position; Screening tests; Public health

资金

  1. Shinshu Public Utility Foundation for Promotion of Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sleeping in the lateral position during pregnancy can potentially reduce the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). However, this hypothesis has not been formally investigated in pregnant women. Unlike previous studies that have relied largely on self-reported measures of sleeping position, we investigated the relationship between SDB and sleeping position during late pregnancy using objective measurements. Thirty pregnant women at the 37th gestational week and 30 non-pregnant women (n-Pr) participated in the present study. The pregnant women were divided into 2 groups: those with body mass index (BMI)30kg/m(2) (with obesity, p-Ob), and those with BMI<30kg/m(2) (without obesity, p-nOb). Data were collected using a portable screening device to detect SDB indicated by the respiratory disturbance index (RDI), as well as sleeping position. The occurrence of the lateral sleeping position was higher in pregnant women than in n-Pr (P<0.05). The total RDI significantly differed among the 3 groups [P<0.01; p-Ob, 10.7 (3.1); p-nOb, 7.0 (3.0); n-Pr, 4.3 (2.9)]. The p-Ob group showed significantly lower RDI in the lateral position than in the supine position (P=0.04). Moreover, there was a significant difference in RDI between p-Ob and p-nOb for the supine position (P=0.001), but there was no between-group difference for the lateral position. Sleeping in the lateral position is likely to mitigate existing SDB in pregnant women with obesity in late pregnancy and may be an effective precaution against undiagnosed SDB and associated complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据