4.7 Article

New strategy of grafting hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA) via gamma ray radiation to modify polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane: Thermodynamic mechanisms of the improved antifouling performance

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 83-91

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.06.044

关键词

Polyvinylidene fluoride; Hydrophilicity; Membrane fouling; Grafting; Thermodynamic mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21506195, 51578509]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ17E080004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane fouling represents one of the greatest challenges for widespread applications of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. This study proposed a new strategy regarding grafting hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA) via gamma ray radiation to improve the antifouling ability of PVDF membranes. The grafted membrane possessed improved antifouling ability for filtration of sodium alginate (SA) solution which was experimentally evidenced by the 92.03% flux recovery ratio (69.68% for the pristine membrane) and 11.54% irreversible fouling ratio (32.76% for the pristine membrane). When subjected to filtration of bovine serum protein (BSA) solution, the grafted membrane showed lower flux decline rate than the pristine membrane, and interestingly, higher BSA solution flux than pure water flux. Thermodynamic analyses indicated that the improved hydrophilicity and the reduced strength of thermodynamic interactions between the grafted membrane and foulants were mainly responsible for the improved antifouling performance. Meanwhile, thermodynamic swelling process affected by ionic strength induced higher BSA solution flux than pure water flux. The revealed thermodynamic mechanisms facilitated to optimize the grafting strategy. This study not only proposed a grafting strategy, but also provided interesting PVDF membranes whose flux can be adjusted by ionic strength, giving important implications for membrane fouling research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据