4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Synthesis optimization of (h0h)-oriented silicalite-1 membranes for butane isomer separation

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 214, 期 -, 页码 51-60

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.02.023

关键词

MFI zeolitemembrane; Butane isomer separation; Membrane orientation; Synthesis optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [21576131, 21366013, 21490585]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tubular oriented silicalite-1 membranes were prepared on the inner surface of a-alumina tubes by secondary (seeded) growth. Membrane microstructures including orientation, thickness and defect densities which affected membrane performance could be regulated by synthesis optimization for butane isomer separation. Synthesis parameters such as synthesis temperature, synthesis time and solution composition were modified. Membrane orientation was greatly affected by synthesis temperature. Two typical membranes of highly (h0h)-oriented and mixed (h0h)&c-oriented membranes were obtained after synthesis optimization. Four highly (h0h)-oriented silicalite-1 membranes prepared under optimized synthesis conditions showed ideal H-2/SF6 selectivities of 1325 +/- 35, which was much higher than that of mixed (h0h)&c-oriented membrane M3 (300), indicating that the former membranes had fewer boundary defects. These highly (h0h)-oriented membranes displayed n-butane permeances and separation factors were (2.26 +/- 0.23) x 10(-7) mol (m(2) s Pa)(-1) and 32.7 +/- 2.5 for an equimolar n-butane/i-butane mixture at 333 K, respectively. The low deviations in permeance and selectivity indicate that membrane synthesis had a good reproducibility. This average n-butane permeance for these highly (h0h)-oriented membranes was 4 times higher than that of mixed (h0h)&c-oriented membrane M3. Both kinds of highly (h0h)- and (h0h)&c- silicalite-1 membranes displayed the similar trend with test temperature and pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据