4.7 Article

Superhydrophilic poly(p-phenylene sulfide) membrane preparation with acid/alkali solution resistance and its usage in oil/water separation

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 262-270

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.065

关键词

Poly(p-phenylene sulfide); Nitric acid; Superhydrophilic; Oil-water separation; Acid/base corrosion resistance

资金

  1. Science and Technology Plans of Tianjin [15PTSYJC00240, 16PTSYJC00090]
  2. China National Textile and Apparel Council [J201406]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21376177, 21676202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Poly(p-phenylene sulfide) (PPS) microporous membrane was prepared via Thermally Induced Phase Separation (TIPS), and the superhydrophilic membrane was modified by nitric acid. After the interfacial reaction between PPS membrane and HNO3, a large number of hydrophilic groups, such as -SO-, -SO2-, C=O, -NH2 and -NO2 groups, were introduced onto PPS membrane surface. When the treatment temperature was 50 degrees C, the characterized results indicated that the membrane became superhydrophilic with contact angle of 0 degrees and pure-water flux of 154.95 L/m(2) h. And the membrane structure was not destroyed during the modification via HNO3. Furthermore, the performance of modified membrane on oil/water separation was studied and all of the separation efficiency were greater than 95% when the modified membrane was utilized to separate four different types of oil/water emulsions. In particular, the modified membrane was utilized to separate the chlorobenzene/water emulsion with the separation efficiency of 98.98%. Both carbonic ink solution and 1 wt% chlorobenzene/water emulsion were filtered with the treated membrane with acid/base solution (pH = 1, 7 and 14) to evaluate the modified membrane corrosion resistance of acid/base, and the characterized results indicated that modified membrane possessed the excellent acid/base corrosion resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据