4.7 Article

Small in-fiber Fabry-Perot low-frequency acoustic pressure sensor with PDMS diaphragm embedded in hollow-core fiber

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL
卷 270, 期 -, 页码 162-169

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2017.12.057

关键词

Index terms; Fiber sensor; Fabry-Perot; Low-frequency acoustic pressure sensor; Hollow-core fiber (HCF)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61425003, 61773102]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N160408001, N150401001]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries [2013ZCX09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A small and low cost extrinsic Fabry-Perot (FP) fiber low-frequency acoustic pressure sensor (EFPAS) based on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) diaphragm is proposed. The EFPAS is fabricated by fusion splicing a single mode fiber (SMF) with a hollow-core fiber (HCF), which embed a PDMS diaphragm by the capillary effect, to form an air micro-cavity. The structural strength of the whole thin diaphragm based sensing probe is improved by the ingenious design, and a high precision optical fiber cutting system can be used to control the length of air micro-cavity. Simulation proves that the PDMS diaphragm with large radius and small thickness will help to improve the sensitivity, but there is a tradeoff between sensitivity and the mechanical strength. Experimental results show that the sensor has the acoustic pressure sensitivity of 0.427 mV/mPa with a high linear pressure response in the range of 5 mPa-720 mPa. A stable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) about 80 dB with a noise floor at 0 dB can be realized at 30 Hz and a 0.5 Hz resolution can be observed ranging from 10 to 50 Hz of low-frequency acoustic wave (The relative error of measured frequency is lower than 1%). Its high precision of low-frequency acoustic measurement and simple fabrication process make it an attractive tool for acoustic sensing and photo-acoustic spectroscopy. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据