4.7 Review

Role of AMPK in atherosclerosis via autophagy regulation

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
卷 61, 期 10, 页码 1212-1221

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-017-9240-2

关键词

adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; autophagy; lipid metabolism; atherosclerosis-associated cell; atherosclerosis

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670401]
  2. Natural Sciences Foundation of Hunan Province [2016JJ6133]
  3. Scientific Research Innovation Program of Post-graduate in Hunan Province [CX2017B554]
  4. Zhengxiang Scholar (Xiangyang Tang) Program of the University of South China
  5. Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Hunan Province (Basic Medicine Sciences in University of South China)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atherosclerosis is characterized by the accumulation of lipids and deposition of fibrous elements in the vascular wall, which is the primary cause of cardiovascular diseases. Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a metabolic sensor of energy metabolism that regulates multiple physiological processes, including lipid and glucose metabolism and the normalization of energy imbalances. Overwhelming evidence indicates that AMPK activation markedly attenuates atherosclerosis development. Autophagy inhibits cell apoptosis and inflammation and promotes cholesterol efflux and efferocytosis. Physiological autophagy is essential for maintaining normal cardiovascular function. Increasing evidence demonstrates that autophagy occurs in developing atherosclerotic plaques. Emerging evidence indicates that AMPK regulates autophagy via a downstream signaling pathway. The complex relationship between AMPK and autophagy has attracted the attention of many researchers because of this close relationship to atherosclerosis development. This review demonstrates the role of AMPK and autophagy in atherosclerosis. An improved understanding of this interrelationship will create novel preventive and therapeutic strategies for atherosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据