4.7 Review

Drug safety and immunogenicity of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: the story so far

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 57, 期 11, 页码 1896-1907

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex434

关键词

immunogenicity; safety; pharmacoepidemiology; tumour necrosis factor inhibitors; infusion reactions; drug-induced lupus; vasculitis; thrombotic events; biomarkers; biosimilars

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research clinical lectureship
  2. North West England Medical Research Council Fellowship Scheme in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics - Medical Research Council [G1000417/94909]
  3. Medical Evaluation Unit
  4. ICON
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. MRC [G1000417] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G1000417] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2015-06-005, CL-2006-06-010] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TNF-alpha inhibitor (TNFi) therapies have transformed the treatment of several rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases. However, the majority of TNFi's are immunogenic and consequent anti-drug antibodies formation can impact on both treatment efficacy and safety. Several controversies exist in the area of immunogenicity of TNFis and drug safety. While anti-drug antibodies to TNFis have been described in association with infusion reactions; serious adverse events (AEs) such as thromboembolic events, lupus-like syndrome, paradoxical AEs, for example, vasculitis-like events and other autoimmune manifestations have also been reported. The expansion of the biologic armamentarium, new treatment strategies such as introduction/switching to biosimilars and cost-saving approaches such as TNFi tapering, may all have a potential impact on immunogenicity and clinical sequelae. In this review we evaluate how evolution of biologics relates to drug safety and immunogenicity, appraise relevant evidence from trials, spontaneous pharmacovigilance and observational studies and outline the areas of uncertainty that still exist.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据