4.4 Article

Is gardening corals of opportunity the appropriate response to reverse Philippine reef decline?

期刊

RESTORATION ECOLOGY
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 1091-1097

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rec.12683

关键词

coral gardening; coral reef rehabilitation; coral reef restoration; corals of opportunity

类别

资金

  1. DOST-Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic, and Natural Resources Research and Development (NACRE Project 1: SHINE)
  2. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (CORVA Project 2: MIRROR
  3. PhilCOMaRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hard coral cover (HCC) in the Philippines has been declining over the past decades. Restoration practices that utilize gardening corals of opportunity (COPs) are actively being adopted throughout the country. However, the use of COPs in coral gardening has not yet been examined in terms of its effectiveness in addressing nationwide-scale reef decline. The feasibility of using COPs for coral gardening was determined through a spreadsheet model that derives COP numbers needed to increase HCC in a reef. The model showed that 280,112 COPs of 5-cm radius need to be transplanted to increase HCC in a hectare of reef from 0% to 22%, the current national average. Annual COP mortality must be less than 31.5% to achieve an increase in HCC above 22% over a span of 10 years following a gardening effort. Actual counts and generic composition of available COPs were recorded from transects in 20 reef stations across three locations in the Philippines (Lian, Luzon; Lubang Island; and Balabac, Palawan). Natural COP densities suggest that large areas of healthy reefs must be searched to obtain enough COPs for an effective gardening effort. Furthermore, the COPs measured in Lian were below the recommended fragment size for transplantation, thus needing nursery rearing to attain the 5-cm radius prescribed for increased probability of transplant survivorship. These findings indicate that applying coral gardening at a nationwide scale is not likely to be feasible, effective, or sustainable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据