4.8 Review

Municipal solid waste: Generation, composition and GHG emissions in Bangalore, India

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 1122-1136

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.085

关键词

Municipal solid waste; Greater Bangalore; Socio-economic factors; Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions; Integrated Solid Waste Management

资金

  1. Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research (APN) [ARCP2011-07CMY-Han]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Municipal solid waste in developing countries mainly consists of degradable materials (> 70%), which plays a significant role in GHG (Greenhouse gas) emissions in urban localities. The increasing municipal solid waste generation along with the high fraction of organic waste and its unscientific disposal is leading to emission of GHG (methane, CO2, etc.) in the atmosphere. Proportion of municipal solid wastes collected by the agencies disposed at identified sites is about 60%, while the balance is disposed-off at unauthorized disposal sites leading to the environmental consequences including greenhouse gas emissions. Mitigation strategy necessitates understanding of composition of waste for its treatment and management in an environmentally sound way. The study revealed that the per capita waste generated is about 91.01 +/- 45.5 g/day with the per capita organic waste generation of 74 +/- 35 g/person/day. The household per capita waste generation was positively related with income and education levels, while negatively related with family (household) size. The organic fractions constitute 82% with the strong recovery potential and conversion to energy or compost range. The total organic waste generated is about 231.01 Gg/year and due to mismanagement consequent emissions are about 604.80 Gg/year. Integrated solid waste management strategy is suggested to manage the organic fractions through technology and policy interventions, which helps in mitigating GHG emissions with potential economic benefits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据