4.3 Article

Consumer accounts of favourable dietary behaviour change and comparison with official dietary guidelines

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 1952-1960

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980018000241

关键词

Dietary guidelines; Eating patterns; Dietary change; Qualitative research

资金

  1. Espacio Interdisciplinario (Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The current study aimed to assess Uruguayan consumers' accounts of their own need to change their dietary patterns, their intended changes and the barriers related to doing so, and to compare the intentions and barriers with the recommendations of the national dietary guidelines. Design: An online survey with 2381 Uruguayan employed adults, aged between 18 and 65 years, 65% females, was conducted. Participants had to answer two open-ended questions related to changes they could make in the foods they eat and/or the way in which they eat to improve the quality of their diet and the reasons why they had not implemented those changes yet. Content analysis using inductive coding by two researchers was used to analyse the responses. Results: Consumers mainly intended to change consumption of types of foods, particularly eating more fruits, vegetables and legumes and consuming less flour, but also intended to alter their eating patterns. Lack of time and the fact that healthy foods are perceived as being more expensive than unhealthy foods were major barriers to behaviour change. Some of the recommendations of the dietary guidelines, particularly those related to enjoying cooking and meals and engaging in it as a social activity, were not represented in consumer accounts. Conclusions: Accompanying policies to the dietary guidelines need to underline the importance of changes in dietary patterns, including greater enjoyment and sharing food preparation and meals in the company with others, address misconceptions about flour, and provide concrete, consumer-derived recommendations on how to enact the guidelines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据