4.2 Article

Factors Associated with Emotional Exhaustion in South Korean Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study

期刊

PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 670-676

出版社

KOREAN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC ASSOC
DOI: 10.30773/pi.2017.12.31

关键词

Nursing staff; Emotional exhaustion; Maslach burnout inventory; Associated factors

资金

  1. National Center for Mental Health Research Education
  2. Seoul National Hospital, Republic of Korea [HM15C1113]
  3. Soonchunhyang University Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective We examined associations between emotional exhaustion and selected sociodemographic and psychological factors among nurses in inpatient and outpatient nursing units at a university hospital in South Korea. Methods The participants were 386 nurses who completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory, a measure of emotional exhaustion. Psychological characteristics were evaluated, including hardiness, self-esteem, experience of trauma, resilience, perceived stress, and social support. Correlation analyses examined the relationships between emotional exhaustion with sociodemographic, occupational, and psychological characteristics. Linear regression was used to evaluate the associations between emotional exhaustion and the assessed characteristics. Results Higher emotional exhaustion scores were associated with greater depression, anxiety, traumatic experience, and perceived stress. Exhaustion was inversely associated with hardiness, self-esteem, resilience, and quality of life. The regression analysis indicated that gender, marriage, resilience, depression, perceived stress, and secondary traumatic stress were significantly associated with emotional exhaustion. Conclusion This study showed that psychological characteristics, such as resilience, depression, and secondary traumatic experiences, may cause emotional exhaustion. Understanding the needs of people with distinct demographic and psychological characteristics offers valuable direction for the development of intervention programs to prevent burnout among nurses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据