How gender determines the way we speak about professionals

The Matthew effect in science funding

(2018) Thijs Bol et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Speaker Introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds: Forms of Address Reveal Gender Bias

(2017) Julia A. Files et al.   JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH

Our obsession with eminence warps research

(2017) Simine Vazire   NATURE

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review

(2017) Andrew Tomkins et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines

(2015) S.-J. Leslie et al.   SCIENCE

Matthew: Effect or Fable?

(2013) Pierre Azoulay et al.   MANAGEMENT SCIENCE

Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students

(2012) C. A. Moss-Racusin et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers

(2009) Rodrigo Costas et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement

(2009) B. A. Nosek et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

The Matthew effect defined and tested for the 100 most prolific economists

(2008) Richard S.J. Tol   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY