4.8 Article

Lipid bilayer composition modulates the unfolding free energy of a knotted α-helical membrane protein

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1714668115

关键词

protein folding; membrane proteins; protein-lipid interactions

资金

  1. European Research Council [294342]
  2. King's College, London
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [294342] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

alpha-Helical membrane proteins have eluded investigation of their thermodynamic stability in lipid bilayers. Reversible denaturation curves have enabled some headway in determining unfolding free energies. However, these parameters have been limited to detergent micelles or lipid bicelles, which do not possess the same mechanical properties as lipid bilayers that comprise the basis of natural membranes. We establish reversible unfolding of the membrane transporter LeuT in lipid bilayers, enabling the comparison of apparent unfolding free energies in different lipid compositions. LeuT is a bacterial ortholog of neurotransmitter transporters and contains a knot within its 12-transmembrane helical structure. Urea is used as a denaturant for LeuT in proteoliposomes, resulting in the loss of up to 30% helical structure depending upon the lipid bilayer composition. Urea unfolding of LeuT in liposomes is reversible, with refolding in the bilayer recovering the original helical structure and transport activity. A linear dependence of the unfolding free energy on urea concentration enables the free energy to be extrapolated to zero denaturant. Increasing lipid headgroup charge or chain lateral pressure increases the thermodynamic stability of LeuT. The mechanical and charge properties of the bilayer also affect the ability of urea to denature the protein. Thus, we not only gain insight to the long-sought-after thermodynamic stability of an alpha-helical protein in a lipid bilayer but also provide a basis for studies of the folding of knotted proteins in a membrane environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据