Soot aggregate morphology in coflow laminar ethylene diffusion flames at elevated pressures

The effect of combustion pressure on soot aggregate morphology and on primary soot particle diameter was investigated by thermophoretic sampling in nitrogen-diluted ethylene flames. Soot aggregate samples were collected using a high-pressure thermophoretic sampling system installed inside the high-pressure combustion chamber. Collected samples were imaged by transmission electron microscopy followed by an automated image analysis process to yield aggregate morphology information. The experiments covered pressures from 3 to 6 bar, and samples were collected at heights of 2 and 5 mm above the burner exit in nitrogen-diluted ethylene (ethylene to nitrogen mole ratio 2:1) flames with nominal visible flame heights of about 20 mm. It was observed that average primary soot particle diameter increased with increasing pressure within the pressure range considered, at both measurement locations within the flame. Fractal parameters of the soot aggregates were inferred directly from the experimental data (as opposed to the usual practice of assuming a priori values for fractal dimension and pre-factor). Near to the soot nucleation and growth regions of the co-flow laminar diffusion flames, at 2 mm above the burner exit, the fractal dimension of the aggregates was not as high as the accepted universal value of about 1.9, in spite of the fact that number of primary particles per aggregate is quite high and pressure is well above atmospheric. At 5 mm above the burner exit, however, the fractal dimension of the soot aggregates approached the accepted universal value of 1.9, at high pressures; at relatively lower pressures, the fractal dimension was about 1.6 at the same location within the flame. In view of the inferred fractal results, caution should be exercised when applying fractal analysis to low heights in flames at lower pressures where soot inception and growth are relatively dominant. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.