4.6 Article

Prediction of absolute risk of acute graft-versus-host disease following hematopoietic cell transplantation

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190610

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA181360-01, 5K24AI116925]
  2. Center for International Blood and Marrow Research (CIBMTR)
  3. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [5U24-CA076518]
  4. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  6. NHLBI [5U10HL069294]
  7. NCI
  8. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA/DHHS) [HHSH250201200016C]
  9. Office of Naval Research [N00014-15-1-0848, N00014-16-1-2020]
  10. *Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  11. Alexion
  12. *Amgen, Inc.
  13. Astellas Pharma US
  14. AstraZeneca
  15. Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc.
  16. Be the Match Foundation
  17. Bluebird Bio, Inc.
  18. Bristol Myers Squibb Oncology
  19. Celgene Corporation
  20. Cellular Dynamics International, Inc.
  21. Cerus Corporation
  22. Chimerix, Inc.
  23. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  24. Gamida Cell Ltd.
  25. Genentech, Inc.
  26. Genzyme Corporation
  27. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
  28. Health Research, Inc.
  29. Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  30. HistoGenetics, Inc.
  31. Incyte Corporation
  32. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
  33. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  34. Jeff Gordon Children's Foundation
  35. The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  36. Medac, GmbH
  37. Medlmmune
  38. Medical College of Wisconsin
  39. Merck Co, Inc.
  40. Mesoblast
  41. MesoScale Diagnostics, Inc.
  42. Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.
  43. National Marrow Donor Program
  44. Neovii Biotech NA, Inc.
  45. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  46. Onyx Pharmaceuticals
  47. Optum Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
  48. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  49. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Japan
  50. PCORI
  51. Perkin Elmer, Inc.
  52. Pfizer, Inc
  53. Sanofi US
  54. Seattle Genetics
  55. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  56. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  57. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  58. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Inc.
  59. Takeda Oncology
  60. Telomere Diagnostics, Inc.
  61. University of Minnesota
  62. Wellpoint, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the treatment of choice for a variety of hematologic malignancies and disorders. Unfortunately, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a frequent complication of HCT. While substantial research has identified clinical, genetic and proteomic risk factors for acute GVHD, few studies have sought to develop risk prediction tools that quantify absolute risk. Such tools would be useful for: optimizing donor selection; guiding GVHD prophylaxis, post-transplant treatment and monitoring strategies; and, recruitment of patients into clinical trials. Using data on 9,651 patients who underwent first allogeneic HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor HCT between 01/1999-12/2011 for treatment of a hematologic malignancy, we developed and evaluated a suite of risk prediction tools for: (i) acute GVHD within 100 days post-transplant and (ii) a composite endpoint of acute GVHD or death within 100 days post-transplant. We considered two sets of inputs: (i) clinical factors that are typically readily-available, included as main effects; and, (ii) main effects combined with a selection of a priori specified two-way interactions. To build the prediction tools we used the super learner, a recently developed ensemble learning statistical framework that combines results from multiple other algorithms/methods to construct a single, optimal prediction tool. Across the final super learner prediction tools, the area-under-the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.613-0.640. Improving the performance of risk prediction tools will likely require extension beyond clinical factors to include biological variables such as genetic and proteomic biomarkers, although the measurement of these factors may currently not be practical in standard clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据