4.6 Article

The epidemiology of personality disorders in the Sao Paulo Megacity general population

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195581

关键词

-

资金

  1. State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation, Brazil (FAPESP) [03/00204-3]
  2. Foundation for Science and Technology of Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil (Fundo de Apoio a Ciencia e Tecnologia do Municipio de Vitoria-FACITEC) [002/2003]
  3. Secretaria de Seguranca Publica of the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil
  4. United States National Institutes of Mental Health [R01MH070884]
  5. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  6. Pfizer Foundation
  7. US Public Health Service [R13-MH066849, R01-MH069864, R01 DA016558]
  8. Fogarty International Center [FIRCA R03-TW006481]
  9. Pan American Health Organization
  10. Eli Lilly and Company Foundation
  11. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  12. GlaxoSmithKline
  13. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  14. Shire
  15. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel-Program of Academic Excellence (CAPES-PROEX), Ministry of Education, Brazil
  16. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [03/00204-3] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Most studies on the epidemiology of personality disorders (PDs) have been conducted in high-income countries and may not represent what happens in most part of the world. In the last decades, population growth has been concentrated in low-and middle-income countries, with rapid urbanization, increasing inequalities and escalation of violence. Our aim is to estimate the prevalence of PDs in the Sao Paulo Metropolitan Area, one of the largest megacities of the world. We examined sociodemographic correlates, the influence of urban stressors, the comorbidity with other mental disorders, functional impairment and treatment. Methods A representative household sample of 2,942 adults was interviewed using the WHO-Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the International Personality Disorder Examination-Screening Questionnaire. Diagnoses were multiply imputed, and analyses used multivariable regression. Results and discussion Prevalence estimates were 4.3% (Cluster A), 2.7% (Cluster B), 4.6% (Cluster C) and 6.8% (any PD). Cumulative exposure to violence was associated with all PDs except Cluster A, although urbanicity, migration and neighborhood social deprivation were not significant predictors. Comorbidity was the rule, and all clusters were associated with other mental disorders. Lack of treatment is a reality in Greater Sao Paulo, and this is especially true for PDs. With the exception of Cluster C, non-comorbid PDs remained largely untreated in spite of functional impairment independent of other mental disorders. Conclusion Personality disorders are prevalent, clinically significant and undertreated, and public health strategies must address the unmet needs of these subjects. Our results may reflect what happens in other developing world megacities, and future studies are expected in other low- and middle-income countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据