4.5 Article

Expression analysis of defense related genes in wheat and maize against Bipolaris sorokiniana

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2018.04.002

关键词

Pathogenesis-related proteins; Wheat; Maize; Bipolaris sorokiniana; Pathogenesis-related protein genes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) are important cereal crops grown worldwide. In Pakistan, various varieties of wheat and maize are grown and a number of biotic and abiotic factors influence its production. These are mainly used as a food source and raw material for animal feed. Bipolaris sorokiniana is a hemibiotrophic phytopathogenic fungus that affects various grass species and causes number of diseases on small grains. An investigation was undertaken to evaluate the comparative expression of pathogenesis-related protein genes in wheat and maize under B. sorokiniana stress. After stress, these crops showed disease resistance by improving biochemical parameters like proline, protein, sugar and chlorophyll content. Morpho-physiological parameters including shoot length, root length, relative water content and fresh as well as dry weight were affected by fungal stress. Expression analysis of PR-proteins in stressed plants of wheat confirmed their role in plant defence. PR-1, Thaumatin-like protein (TLP), and beta 1,3 glucanase were highly expressed under stress in wheat variety (RWP13), it suggests the role of these genes in the prescribed variety. These genes did not show their expression in susceptible wheat variety (SWG13). Zm PR-5 and Zm 1,3 beta-glucanase were highly expressed in maize variety (RMN27) after stress which suggests their role in defence mechanism of this variety. While on the other hand, no significant expression of these genes was observed in susceptible maize variety (SMIG). In future, these genes can be over-expressed in transgenic plants to make them resistant against a number of biotic and abiotic factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据