4.6 Article

Bound and continuum-embedded states of cyanopolyyne anions

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 4805-4817

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cp08227d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Army Research Office [W911NF-16-1-0232]
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyanopolyyne anions were among the first anions discovered in the interstellar medium. The discovery has raised questions about the routes of formation of these anions in space. Some of the proposed mechanisms assumed that anionic excited electronic states, either metastable or weakly bound, play a key role in the formation process. The verification of this hypothesis requires detailed knowledge of the electronic states of the anions. Here we investigate the bound and continuum states of four cyanopolyyne anions, CN-, C3N-, C5N-, and C7N-, by means of ab initio calculations. We employ the equation-of-motion coupled-cluster method augmented with complex absorbing potential. We predict that already in CN-, the smallest anion in the family, there are several low-lying metastable states of both singlet and triplet spin symmetry. These states, identified as shape resonances, are located between 6.3-8.5 eV above the ground state of the anion (or 2.3-4.5 eV above the ground state of the parent radical) and have widths of a few tenths of eV up to 1 eV. We analyze the identified resonances in terms of leading molecular orbital contributions and Dyson orbitals. As the carbon chain length increases in the C2n+1N- series, these resonances gradually become stabilized and eventually turn into stable valence bound states. The trends in the energies of the transitions leading to both resonance and bound excited states can be rationalized by means of the Huckel model. Apart from valence excited states, some of the cyanopolyynes can also support dipole bound states and dipole stabilized resonances, owing to a large dipole moment of the parent radicals in the lowest (2)Sigma(+) state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据