4.4 Article

Detection of structural abnormalities of cortical and subcortical gray matter in patients with MRI-negative refractory epilepsy using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.03.005

关键词

NODDI; DTI; MRI negative refractory epilepsy; Cortical and subcortical gray matter

资金

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences [94-02-30-28454]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: NODDI (Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging) and DTI (Diffusion tensor imaging) may be useful in identifying abnormal regions in patients with MRI-negative refractory epilepsy. The aim of this study was to determine whether NODDI and DTI maps including neurite density (ND), orientation dispersion index (ODI), mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) can detect structural abnormalities in cortical and subcortical gray matter (GM) in these patients. The correlation between these parameters and clinical characteristics of the disease was also investigated. Methods: NODDI and DTI maps of 17 patients were obtained and checked visually. Region of interest (ROI) was drawn on suspected areas and contralateral regions in cortex. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was determined for each region. Furthermore volumetric data and mean values of ND, ODI, FA and MD of subcortical GM structures were calculated in both of the patients and controls. Finally, the correlations of these parameters in the subcortical with age of onset and duration of epilepsy were investigated. Results: Cortical abnormalities on ODI images were observed in eight patients qualitatively. CNR of ODI was significantly greater than FA and MD. The subcortical changes including decrease of FA and ND and increase of ODI in left nucleus accumbens and increase of the volume in right amygdala were detected in the patients. Conclusions: The results revealed that NODDI can improve detection of microstructural changes in cortical and subcortical GM in patients with MRI negative epilepsy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据