Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Seven Countries
出版年份 2018 全文链接
标题
Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Seven Countries
作者
关键词
-
出版物
PHARMACOECONOMICS
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 675-697
出版商
Springer Nature
发表日期
2018-02-22
DOI
10.1007/s40273-018-0623-8
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- EQ-5D-5L versus EQ-5D-3L: The Impact on Cost Effectiveness in the United Kingdom
- (2018) Monica Hernandez Alava et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- In search of a common currency: A comparison of seven EQ-5D-5L value sets
- (2017) Jan Abel Olsen et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England
- (2017) Nancy J. Devlin et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China
- (2017) Nan Luo et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Quality Control Process for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies
- (2017) Juan M. Ramos-Goñi et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future
- (2017) Nancy J. Devlin et al. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada
- (2016) Feng Xie et al. MEDICAL CARE
- What Determines the Shape of an EQ-5D Index Distribution?
- (2016) David Parkin et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health Outcomes
- (2016) Mark Oppe et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea
- (2016) Seon-Ha Kim et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan
- (2016) Takeru Shiroiwa et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D
- (2016) Matthijs M. Versteegh et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to EQ-5D-3L in the Thai diabetes patients
- (2015) Juntana Pattanaphesaj et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Why do multi-attribute utility instruments produce different utilities: the relative importance of the descriptive systems, scale and ‘micro-utility’ effects
- (2015) Jeff Richardson et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement
- (2015) Barbara L. Conner-Spady et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- An Exploratory Study to Test the Impact on Three “Bolt-On” Items to the EQ-5D
- (2015) Yaling Yang et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Health systems' responsiveness and reporting behaviour: Multilevel analysis of the influence of individual-level factors in 64 countries
- (2015) Nicole Valentine et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- The EQ-5D-5L Improves on the EQ-5D-3L for Health-related Quality-of-life Assessment in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty
- (2014) Meridith E. Greene et al. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
- Comparing the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: measurement properties and association with chronic conditions and multimorbidity in the general population
- (2014) Calypse B Agborsangaya et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke patients
- (2014) Dominik Golicki et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- The EQ-5D-5L index score is more discriminative than the EQ-5D-3L index score in diabetes patients
- (2014) Chen-Wei Pan et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Comparison between the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-5D-3L in patients with hepatitis B
- (2014) Y. X. Jia et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Chinese Time Trade-Off Values for EQ-5D Health States
- (2014) Gordon G. Liu et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- A Program of Methodological Research to Arrive at the New International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol
- (2014) Mark Oppe et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Comparing EQ-5D Valuation Studies
- (2013) Feng Xie et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Effect of Adding a Sleep Dimension to the EQ-5D Descriptive System
- (2013) Yaling Yang et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Development of a Disease-Specific Version of the EQ-5D-5L for Use in Patients Suffering from Psoriasis: Lessons Learned from a Feasibility Study in the UK
- (2013) Paul Swinburn et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Use of anchoring vignettes to evaluate health reporting behavior amongst adults aged 50 years and above in Africa and Asia – testing assumptions
- (2013) Siddhivinayak Hirve et al. Global Health Action
- Canadian Valuation of EQ-5D Health States: Preliminary Value Set and Considerations for Future Valuation Studies
- (2012) Nick Bansback et al. PLoS One
- Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study
- (2012) M. F. Janssen et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Comparing the performance of the standard EQ-5D 3L with the new version EQ-5D 5L in patients with chronic hepatic diseases
- (2012) Luciana Scalone et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets
- (2012) Ben van Hout et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
- (2011) M. Herdman et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Comparison of the Underlying Constructs of the EQ-5D and Oxford Hip Score: Implications for Mapping
- (2011) Mark Oppe et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
- (2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study
- (2010) Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D
- (2010) Nora Wille et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- South Korean Time Trade-Off Values for EQ-5D Health States: Modeling with Observed Values for 101 Health States
- (2009) Yeon-Kyeng Lee et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started