4.7 Article

First do no harm: uterine natural killer (NK) cells in assisted reproduction

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 1519-1525

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev098

关键词

uterine natural killer cells; assisted reproduction; miscarriage; immunotherapy; embryo

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, UK
  3. University of Cambridge
  4. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2014-14-006] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural killer (NK) cells are a type of lymphocyte circulating in peripheral blood named because of their effector functions in killing target cells. Immune cells that share similar phenotypic characteristics but are poor killers populate the uterine lining at implantation and during early pregnancy when the placenta is established. The functions of these uterineNK(uNK) cells are essentially unknownbut available data point to a role in regulating placentation in concert with other elements of the decidua and invading trophoblast cells. Despite the lack of scientific rationale and advice from clinical governing bodies, such as the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, an increasing range of tests and therapies are still offered to women undergoing IVF or attending recurrent miscarriage clinics based on the myth that uterine NK cells need suppressing to prevent damage to the embryo. New treatments can be introduced at whim with subsequent demands for expensive trials to prove/disprove their efficacy. The evidence that targeting uNK or peripheral blood NK cells assists women with recurrent pregnancy failure is lacking. Healthcare professionals and patients should very carefully evaluate the practice of immunomodulation to enhance pregnancy outcome. A discussion on how to move towards stricter regulation of immunotherapy in non-hospital settings is now needed because it is clear that the potential risks and costs of these therapies outweigh any benefits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据