4.6 Article

alpha-Tocopherol-based cationic amphiphiles with a novel pH sensitive hybrid linker for gene delivery

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 16, 页码 2932-2946

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ob00276b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, SERB-DST, Government of India, New Delhi
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endosomal escape is one of the barriers for the efficient liposomal gene delivery. To address this and based on earlier encouraging results using tocopherol cationic lipids, we elaborated chemical modifications on tocopherol cationic lipids by introducing a novel hybrid pH sensitive linker ether-beta-hydroxytriazole between tocopherol, the anchoring moiety and the basic tris(2-hydroxy ethyl) quaternary ammonium head group (Lp2). As control lipids we designed two lipids (Lp1 and Lp3), one is with only the ether-beta-hydroxy linker in between a-tocopherol and quaternary tris(2-hydroxyethyl) ammonium (Lp1) and the other is with the same novel hybrid linker i.e. ether-beta-hydroxy-triazole between the alpha-tocopherol linked and quaternary tris-ethyl ammonium head group (Lp3). Liposomes were formulated with a combination of a well-known co-lipid, 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE) and biophysical characteristics such as DNA binding, hydrodynamic diameters and global surface charges for liposomes and lipoplexes of respective lipids were evaluated. Cell viability assay and in vitro transfection studies were carried out in NIH3 T3, B16F10, HEK-293, and HepG2 cell lines. In vitro transfection data for the liposomes of lipids (Lp1, Lp2 and Lp3) revealed that the Lp2 lipid with a novel hybrid pH sensitive linker showed superior transfection efficiency when compared with the remaining two analogues. More importantly, Lp2 has shown a similar pattern of transfection efficiency in HepG2 and HEK-293 cell lines when compared with commercially available Lipofectamine 3000.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据