4.7 Article

The impact of distribution channels on trial-version provision with a positive network effect

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.06.002

关键词

Free trial; Agent selling; Supply chain management; Positive network effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71771154, 71702109, 71471118, 71371127]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2017A030310304, 2017A030310566]
  3. Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [14YJC630096]
  4. Major Project for National Natural Science Foundation of China [71790615]
  5. Key Project of National Nature Science Foundation of China [71431006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many software developers provide end-users with feature-limited free trials to facilitate the distribution of their commercial products. Some international developers also authorize local agents to resell software products to consumers. In this paper, we explore a software developer's optimal trial strategy in the presence of an agent. Due to the involvement of the agent, the double marginalization effect may result in a higher price and a lower demand for the commercial software. We find that, if the network effect is strong enough, the developer will release a trial version and attract trial users to secure greater positive externality, which is consistent with the case without an agent involved. However, if the network effect is weak, the developer may still release a trial version to the public, which sharply contrasts the case without an agent involved. A trial is offered in a bid to countervail the negative double marginalization effect. We also extend this work by endogenizing the trial-version quality, and examining the differentiation induced by trial offer decisions made by different firms in the supply chain. Furthermore, we investigate the effects induced by consumers' differentiated costs of using the free trial and commercial versions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据