4.8 Article

Genetic and epigenetic variation in 5S ribosomal RNA genes reveals genome dynamics in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 3019-3033

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky163

关键词

-

资金

  1. Region Auvergne
  2. Agence National de Recherche [ANR-11 JSV2 009 01, ANR-12 ISV6 0001]
  3. European Union's Horizon research and innovation program [Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant] [752846]
  4. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  5. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  6. University Clermont Auvergne
  7. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [752846] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organized in tandem repeat arrays in most eukaryotes and transcribed by RNA polymerase III, expression of 5S rRNA genes is under epigenetic control. To unveil mechanisms of transcriptional regulation, we obtained here in depth sequence information on 5S rRNA genes from the Arabidopsis thaliana genome and identified differential enrichment in epigenetic marks between the three 5S rDNA loci situated on chromosomes 3, 4 and 5. We reveal the chromosome 5 locus as the major source of an atypical, long 5S rRNA transcript characteristic of an open chromatin structure. 5S rRNA genes from this locus translocated in the Landsberg erecta ecotype as shown by linkage mapping and chromosome-specific FISH analysis. These variations in 5S rDNA locus organization cause changes in the spatial arrangement of chromosomes in the nucleus. Furthermore, 5S rRNA gene arrangements are highly dynamic with alterations in chromosomal positions through translocations in certain mutants of the RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway and important copy number variations among ecotypes. Finally, variations in 5S rRNA gene sequence, chromatin organization and transcripts indicate differential usage of 5S rDNA loci in distinct ecotypes. We suggest that both the usage of existing and new 5S rDNA loci resulting from translocations may impact neighboring chromatin organizations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据