4.7 Review

Impaired peripheral glucose homeostasis and Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 172-181

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.11.027

关键词

Type 2 diabetes; Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid-beta (A beta); Islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP); Insulin resistance

资金

  1. Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) [NOD_PF-3-15-4731-NW]
  2. Brazilian funding agency Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [159674/2015-8]
  3. International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB) [WW-160926]
  4. International Society for Neurochemistry (ISN) (ISN-CAEN 1A Travel Grant)
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-115056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia. Recent studies suggest that metabolic disturbances, particularly type 2 diabetes (T2D) increase the risk of cognitive decline and AD. AD is also a risk factor for T2D, and a growing body of evidence indicates that these diseases are connected both at clinical and molecular levels. In T2D, peripheral insulin resistance, hyperglycemia and eventually insulin deficiency develops, leading to an overall decline in tissue health. More recently, brain insulin resistance has been shown to be a key feature of AD that is linked to neuronal dysfunction and cognitive impairment. Furthermore, both AD and T2D are amyloidogenic diseases, with abnormal aggregation of amyloid-beta peptide (A beta) and islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) respectively contributing to cellular death and disease pathogenesis. Emerging data suggests that A beta may have peripheral effects including its co-deposition in the pancreas. In this review, we discuss how peripheral effects of A beta and metabolic disturbances may impact AD pathogenesis. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Metabolic Impairment as Risk Factors for Neurodegenerative Disorders.' (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据