4.7 Article

Age at menopause and lifetime cognition Findings from a British birth cohort study

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 90, 期 19, 页码 E1673-E1681

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005486

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12019/1, MC_UU_12019/3, MC_UU_12019/4]
  2. MRC [MC_UU_12019/3, MC_UU_12019/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective We investigated whether cognitive performance between ages 43 and 69 years was associated with timing of menopause, controlling for hormone replacement therapy, childhood cognitive ability, and sociobehavioral factors. Methods We used data from 1,315 women participating in the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development (a British birth cohort study) with known age at period cessation and up to 4 assessments of verbal memory (word-learning task) and processing speed (letter-cancellation task) at ages 43, 53, 60-64, and 69. We fitted multilevel models with linear and quadratic age terms, stratified by natural or surgical menopause, and adjusted for hormone replacement therapy, body mass index, smoking, occupational class, education, and childhood cognitive ability. Results Verbal memory increased with later age at natural menopause (0.17 words per year, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-0.27, p = 0.001); an association remained, albeit attenuated, after full adjustment (0.09, 95% CI: 0.02-0.17, p = 0.013). Verbal memory also increased with later age at surgical menopause (0.16, 95% CI: 0.06-0.27, p = 0.002), but this association was fully attenuated after adjustment. Search speed was not associated with age at menopause. Conclusion Our findings suggest lifelong hormonal processes, not just short-term fluctuations during the menopause transition, may be associated with verbal memory, consistent with evidence from a variety of neurobiological studies; mechanisms are likely to involve estrogen receptor beta function. Further follow-up is required to assess fully the clinical significance of these associations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据