4.8 Article

A quantum-dot heat engine operating close to the thermodynamic efficiency limits

期刊

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 920-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-018-0200-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-People-2013-ITN) under REA grant [608153]
  2. Swedish Energy Agency [P38331-1]
  3. Swedish Research Council [621-2012-5122, 2014-5490, 2015-00619, 2016-03824]
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [2016.0089]
  5. Marie Sklodowska Curie Actions, Cofund [INCA 600398]
  6. NanoLund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyclical heat engines are a paradigm of classical thermodynamics, but are impractical for miniaturization because they rely on moving parts. A more recent concept is particle-exchange (PE) heat engines, which uses energy filtering to control a thermally driven particle flow between two heat reservoirs(1,2). As they do not require moving parts and can be realized in solid-state materials, they are suitable for lowpower applications and miniaturization. It was predicted that PE engines could reach the same thermodynamically ideal efficiency limits as those accessible to cyclical engines(3-6), but this prediction has not been verified experimentally. Here, we demonstrate a PE heat engine based on a quantum dot (QD) embedded into a semiconductor nanowire. We directly measure the engine's steady-state electric power output and combine it with the calculated electronic heat flow to determine the electronic efficiency eta. We find that at the maximum power conditions, eta is in agreement with the Curzon-Ahlborn efficiency(6-9 )and that the overall maximum eta is in excess of 70% of the Carnot efficiency while maintaining a finite power output. Our results demonstrate that thermoelectric power conversion can, in principle, be achieved close to the thermodynamic limits, with direct relevance for future hot-carrier photovoltaicsi(10), on-chip coolers or energy harvesters for quantum technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据