4.8 Article

Enhanced stability and performance of few-layer black phosphorus transistors by electron beam irradiation

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 10, 期 24, 页码 11616-11623

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr01678j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few layer black phosphorus (BP) has recently emerged as a potential graphene analogue due to its high mobility and direct, appreciable, band gap. The fabrication and characterization of field effect transistors (FETs) involves exposure of the channel material to an electron beam (e-beam) in imaging techniques such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and fabrication techniques like electron beam lithography (EBL). Despite this, the effect of e-beam irradiation on BP-FET performance has not been studied experimentally. In this work, we report the first experimental study on the impact of e-beam irradiation on BP-FETs. An electron beam is known to induce defects and structural changes in 2D materials like graphene, MoS(2)etc. resulting in the deterioration of the device quality. However, for BP-FETs, we observe an improvement in the on-current and carrier mobility () along with a decrease in threshold voltage (V-th) on exposure to an e-beam with 15 keV energy for 80 seconds. These changes can be attributed to the capture of electrons by traps near the SiO2-BP interface and reduced BP surface roughness due to e-beam exposure. Hysteresis measurements and physical characterization (i.e. atomic force microscopy (AFM), X-ray photoelectron (XPS) and Raman spectroscopies) validate these mechanisms. Reduced hysteresis indicates occupation of the traps, AFM surface scans indicate reduced surface roughness and XPS data show a reduced phosphorus oxide (POx) peak immediately after exposure. Raman measurements indicate a probable structural change due to the interaction between e-beam and BP which could result in better stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据