4.7 Article

Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with bispectrum and power spectrum from upcoming optical and radio surveys

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1029

关键词

methods: statistical; cosmology: theory; early Universe; large-scale structure of universe

资金

  1. European Union under REA [706896]
  2. Templeton Foundation
  3. Spanish MINECO of ICCUB (Unidad de Excelencia 'Maria de Maeztu') [MDM-2014-0369]
  4. Spanish Mineco of ICCUB (Unidad de Excelencia Maria de Maeztu) [MDM-2014-0369, AYA2014-58747-PAEI/FEDERUE]
  5. European UnionOs Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme ERC (BePreSySe) [725327]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We forecast constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG) and bias parameters from measurements of galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum in future radio continuum and optical surveys. In the galaxy bispectrum, we consider a comprehensive list of effects, including the bias expansion for non-Gaussian initial conditions up to second order, redshift space distortions, redshift uncertainties and theoretical errors. These effects are all combined in a single PNG forecast for the first time. Moreover, we improve the bispectrum modelling over previous forecasts, by accounting for trispectrum contributions. All effects have an impact on final predicted bounds, which varies with the type of survey. We find that the bispectrum can lead to improvements up to a factor similar to 5 over bounds based on the power spectrum alone, leading to significantly better constraints for local-type PNG, with respect to current limits from Planck. Future radio and photometric surveys could obtain a measurement error of sigma(f(NL)(loc)) approximate to 0.2. In the case of equilateral PNG, galaxy bispectrum can improve upon present bounds only if significant improvements in the redshift determinations of future, large volume, photometric or radio surveys could be achieved. For orthogonal non-Gaussianity, expected constraints are generally comparable to current ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据