4.6 Article

Fluoxetine Modulates the Activity of Hypothalamic POMC Neurons via mTOR Signaling

期刊

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 55, 期 12, 页码 9267-9279

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-018-1052-6

关键词

Fluoxetine; Hypothalamus; POMC neurons; Patch clamp; Plasticity; mTOR pathway

资金

  1. Telethon [TDMM00707TU]
  2. Italian Ministry of Education [2015 TC3Y9B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons are important players in the regulation of energy homeostasis; we previously demonstrated that environmental stimulation excites arcuate nucleus circuits to undergo plastic remodeling, leading to altered ratio between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic contacts on these neurons. The widely used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (FLX) is known to affect body weight. On the other hand, FLX administration mimics the effects of environmental stimulation on synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus and cortex. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is instrumental in these phenomena. Thus, we aimed at investigating whether and how FLX affects POMC neurons activity and hypothalamic mTOR function. Adult mice expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the POMC promoter were treated with FLX for 3weeks resulting in diminished body weight. Patch clamp recordings performed on POMC neurons indicate that FLX increases their firing rate and the excitatory AMPA-mediated transmission, and reduces the inhibitory GABAergic currents at presynaptic level. Immunofluorescence studies indicate that FLX increases the ratio between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic contacts on POMC neurons. These changes are associated with an increased activity of the hypothalamic mTOR pathway. Use of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin blunts the effects of FLX on body weight and on functional and structural plasticity of POMC neurons. Our findings indicate that FLX is able to remodel POMC neurons, and that this may be partly mediated by the mTOR signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据