4.5 Article

Upregulation of SIRT1 inhibits H2O2-induced osteoblast apoptosis via FoxO1/β-catenin pathway

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 6681-6690

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8657

关键词

SIRT1; osteoblast; osteoporosis; FoxO1; beta-catenin; Gadd45; PPAR-gamma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoporosis is a disease that significantly influences life expectancy and quality in humans. Oxidative stress may stimulate bone marrow osteoclast differentiation and inhibit osteoblast (OB) differentiation. OB proliferation and differentiation are affected by the forkhead box O (FoxO)1/beta-catenin signaling pathway. The osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be promoted by silent information regulator type-1 [sirtuin (SIRT)1]. However, the molecular mechanism of SIRT1 regulation of osteogenic differentiation of MSCs remains unclear, and further elucidation is needed. The present study investigated the role of SIRT1 in the FoxO1/beta-catenin signaling pathway in oxidative stress and its mechanism in the osteoblastic progenitor cell line (MC3T3-E1). The results demonstrated that OB apoptosis and elevated oxidative stress in cells were simulated by H2O2, which was inhibited by moderate SIRT1 overexpression through reducing the oxidative stress. Further studies revealed that FOXO1 and beta-catenin pathway activity was downregulated by SIRT1 and eventually resulted in inhibition of target genes, including the proapoptotic gene B cell lymphoma-2 interacting mediator of cell death, DNA repair gene growth arrest and DNA damage inducible protein 45 and the OB differentiation suppressor gene peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma. Furthermore, beta-catenin and PPAR-gamma were inhibited by SIRT1. Overall, the results of the present study suggest that moderate overexpression of SIRT1 (similar to 3-fold of normal level) may directly or indirectly inhibit apoptosis of OBs via the FOXO1 and beta-catenin signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据