4.4 Review

An Update on Genetic Modification of Chickpea for Increased Yield and Stress Tolerance

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 60, 期 8, 页码 651-663

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s12033-018-0096-1

关键词

Chickpea; Transgenics; Agrobacterium; Abiotic stress; Biotic stress

资金

  1. New Initiative (as a Cross Flow Technology project) Root Biology and its Correlation to Sustainable Plant Development and Soil Fertility from Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)
  2. Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chickpea is a highly nutritious grain legume crop, widely appreciated as a health food, especially in the Indian subcontinent. The major constraints on chickpea production are biotic (Helicoverpa, bruchid, aphid, ascochyta) and abiotic (drought, heat, salt, cold) stresses, which reduce the yield by up to 90%. Various strategies like conventional breeding, molecular breeding, and modern plant breeding have been used to overcome these problems. Conventionally, breeding programs aim at development of varieties that combine maximum number of traits through inter-specific hybridization, wide hybridization, and hybridization involving more than two parents. Breeding is difficult in this crop because of its self-pollinating nature and limited genetic variation. Recent advances in in vitro culture and gene technologies offer unique opportunities to realize the full potential of chickpea production. However, as of date, no transgenic chickpea variety has been approved for cultivation in the world. In this review, we provide an update on the development of genetically modified chickpea plants, including those resistant to Helicoverpa armigera, Callosobruchus maculatus, Aphis craccivora, as well as to drought and salt stress. The genes utilized for development of resistance against pod borer, bruchid, aphid, drought, and salt tolerance, namely, Bt, alpha amylase inhibitor, ASAL, P5CSF129A, and P5CS, respectively, are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据