4.3 Article

Synthesis and Antimalarial Activity of New Enantiopure Aminoalcoholpyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxalines

期刊

MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 293-303

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1573406413666170726123938

关键词

Antimalarial activity; asymmetric synthesis; aminoalcoholquinoline derivatives; aminoalcoholpyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline; derivatives; in vitro cytotoxicity; HepG2

资金

  1. DGA (Direction Generale de l'Armement, Ministere de la Defense, France)
  2. ANR Astrid [ANR-12-STR-003]
  3. Region Picardie
  4. ANR
  5. DGA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We prepared a novel series of enantiopure mefloquine analogues with pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline core in order to fight Plasmodium falciparum resistant strain. Objectives: To observe the influence of pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline core versus quinoline core on the antimalarial activity. Method: Four enantiopure aminoalcoholpyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxalines 2 were synthetized via Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation reaction in eight steps. Their antimalarial activity was evaluated on two Plasmodium falciparum strains 3D7 and W2 with a SYBR Green I fluorescence-based method and their cytotoxicity was measured on four cell lines HepG2, THP-1, CHO and HFF. Results: IC50 values of the four compounds 2 were close to the micromolar against the two P. falciparum strains. They were more active against P. falciparum strain W2 vs. P. falciparum strain 3D7. (R)-enantiomers were always more active than their (S)-counterpart whatever the strain. Selectivity indexes of compounds 2 were lower than 100. Conclusion: A novel series of enantiopure aminoalcohols with pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline core were synthesized in eight steps. They displayed IC50 values close to the micromolar against two P. falciparum strains 3D7 and W2. Although, In this series, 2,8-bistrifluoromethylquinoline was a best core than pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline for an optimal antimalarial activity, the pyrroloquinoxaline 2b showed an interesting antimalarial activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据